Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
JAMA. 2005 May 18;293(19):2384-90.

Five years after To Err Is Human: what have we learned?

Author information

  • 1Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass 02215, USA. leape@hsph.harvard.edu

Abstract

Five years ago, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) called for a national effort to make health care safe. Although progress since then has been slow, the IOM report truly "changed the conversation" to a focus on changing systems, stimulated a broad array of stakeholders to engage in patient safety, and motivated hospitals to adopt new safe practices. The pace of change is likely to accelerate, particularly in implementation of electronic health records, diffusion of safe practices, team training, and full disclosure to patients following injury. If directed toward hospitals that actually achieve high levels of safety, pay for performance could provide additional incentives. But improvement of the magnitude envisioned by the IOM requires a national commitment to strict, ambitious, quantitative, and well-tracked national goals. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality should bring together all stakeholders, including payers, to agree on a set of explicit and ambitious goals for patient safety to be reached by 2010.

Comment in

  • To Err Is Human 5 years later. [JAMA. 2005]
  • To Err Is Human 5 years later. [JAMA. 2005]
PMID:
15900009
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk