Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Am J Clin Pathol. 2005 Jun;123(6):851-7.

Significance of stromal reaction patterns in invasive urothelial carcinoma.

Author information

  • 1Department of Surgical Pathology, Sullivan Nicolaides, Pathology, Brisbane, Australia.

Abstract

We evaluated the types, frequency, and significance of stromal reaction patterns in urothelial carcinoma (UC) of the bladder in 60 transurethrally resected pT1 specimens (low-grade UC, 12; high-grade UC, 48). We observed 5 reaction patterns with 1 pattern in 37 cases (62%) and 2 or more patterns in the remainder. Dominant and secondary patterns, respectively, were as follows: stromal retraction, 30 (50%) and 4 (7%); edema, 18 (30%) and 1 (2%); inflammation, 8 (13%) and 14 (23%); fibroblastic proliferation, 3 (5%) and 5 (8%); fibrosis, 1 (2%) and 4 (7%). Progression occurred in 21 cases, including 9 (30%) of 30 with stromal retraction, 8 (45%) of 18 with edema, 2 (25%) of 8 with inflammation, 1 (33%) of 3 with fibroblastic proliferation, and 1 (100%) of 1 with fibrosis. Differences in progression rates and mean progression-free survival times were not statistically significant. We found that the most common stromal reaction in UC of the bladder is stromal retraction. Stromal reaction patterns seem to have some prognostic usefulness. Cases with stromal edema might benefit from closer follow-up. Awareness of the different types of stromal reactions also is useful for diagnosing invasion.

PMID:
15899775
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk