Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Gynecol Oncol. 2005 May;97(2):612-7.

Comparison of type-specific human papillomavirus data from self and clinician directed sampling.

Author information

  • 1The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, 1501 N. Campbell Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE(S):

To compare the type-specific human papillomavirus (HPV) recovery from physician and patient-collected samples.

METHODS:

Three hundred thirty-four (334) women attending colposcopy clinics in three countries were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Cervicovaginal samples were collected by patients and physicians and processed with polymerase chain reaction and reverse line blot genotyping. McNemar's Chi-squared tests and Kappa statistics were utilized to determine statistical associations between physician- versus patient-collected samples.

RESULTS:

Oncogenic HPV infection was identified in 23.2% of patient-collected specimens compared to 34.9% of physician-collected specimens. Physician sampling detected significantly more infections with type 16 and 52 than did self-sampling and significantly more oncogenic HPV infection overall. For non-oncogenic HPV detection, there was no statistical difference between physician- and patient-collected samples.

CONCLUSION(S):

Patient sampling for HPV using a single vaginal brush does not identify all oncogenic HPV subtypes.

PMID:
15863168
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk