Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Can J Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;50(3):167-74.

    Using metaanalysis to evaluate evidence: practical tips and traps.

    Source

    Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver. r.lam@ubc.ca

    Abstract

    Although practising evidence-based medicine is the goal of most physicians, it can be a real challenge to sift through the vast body of data to determine the best strategies. Most clinical guidelines regard replicated randomized controlled trials (RCTs), metaanalyses, and systematic reviews as the highest level of evidence to support treatment recommendations. High-quality metaanalyses can overcome many of the drawbacks of individual RCTs and qualitative reviews. They can reduce bias, provide adequate power to demonstrate real differences in outcomes, and resolve the results of inconsistent studies. This paper focuses on basic principles and terms used in metaanalysis, so that clinicians can appropriately evaluate and use their results to guide treatment decisions.

    PMID:
    15830827
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk