Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    World J Surg. 2005 May;29(5):557-60.

    How to analyze an article.

    Source

    Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Tufts University School of Medicine, Tufts-New England Medical Center, 750 Washington Street, Boston, Massuchusetts 02111, USA. jurschel@buffalo.edu

    Abstract

    In clinical research investigators generalize from study samples to populations, and in evidence-based medicine practitioners apply population-level evidence to individual patients. The validity of these processes is assessed through critical appraisal of published articles. Critical appraisal is therefore a core component of evidence-based medicine (EBM). The purpose of critical appraisal is not one of criticizing for criticism's sake. Instead, it is an exercise in assigning a value to an article. A checklist approach to article appraisal is outlined, and common pitfalls of analysis are highlighted. Relevant questions are posed for each section of an article (introduction, methods, results, discussion). The approach is applicable to most clinical surgical research articles, even those of a nonrandomized nature. Issues specific to evidence-based surgical practice, in contrast to evidence-based medicine, are introduced.

    PMID:
    15827843
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Springer

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk