Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Health Econ. 2005 May;24(3):489-513.

Is prenatal care really ineffective? Or, is the 'devil' in the distribution?

Author information

  • 1Department of Economics, University of New Hampshire, Durham, 03824, USA.

Abstract

Prenatal care should improve infant health, yet research frequently finds only weak effects. If there are two kinds of pregnancies, 'complicated' and 'normal' ones, then combining these pregnancies may lead prenatal care to appear ineffective. Data from the National Maternal and Infant Health Survey (NMIHS) offers compelling evidence. The standard 2SLS approach yields obviously bimodal residuals and frequently insignificant prenatal care coefficients. In contrast, estimating birth weights with a finite mixture model yields estimates revealing that prenatal care has a substantial effect on 'normal' pregnancies. Our Monte Carlo experiment confirms that ignoring even a small proportion of 'complicated' pregnancies can lead prenatal care to appear unimportant.

PMID:
15811540
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk