Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005 Feb;28(2):122-7.

Reliability of McKenzie classification of patients with cervical or lumbar pain.

Author information

  • 1School of Physiotherapy, The University of Sydney, 2141, Australia. clare.ha@bigpond.com

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

In the McKenzie system, patients are classified first into syndromes, then into subsyndromes. At present, the reliability of classification with this system is unclear. No study has included patients with cervical pain, and the studies to date have reported conflicting results.

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of the study is to investigate the interexaminer reliability of the McKenzie classification system for patients with cervical or lumbar pain.

SUBJECTS:

Fifty patients with spinal pain (25 with lumbar pain and 25 with cervical pain) were included in the study.

METHOD:

The patients were assessed simultaneously by 2 physical therapists (14 in total) trained in the McKenzie method. Agreement was expressed using the multirater kappa coefficient and percent agreement for classification into (i) syndromes and (ii) subsyndromes.

RESULTS:

The reliability for syndrome classification was kappa = 0.84 with 96% agreement for the total patient pool, kappa = 1.0 with 100% agreement for lumbar patients, and kappa = 0.63 with 92% agreement for cervical patients. The reliability for subsyndrome classification was kappa = 0.87 with 90% agreement for the total patient pool, kappa = 0.89 with 92% agreement for lumbar patients, and kappa = 0.84 with 88% agreement for the cervical patients.

CONCLUSION:

The McKenzie assessment performed by persons trained in the McKenzie method may allow for reliable classification of patients with lumbar and cervical pain.

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk