Evidence for specific protein–DNA interactions within the promoter of ENO1. (A) A schematic diagram showing the intergenic region between ENO1 and the 3′ end of ENO2 which was used to generate DNA fragments for proteins binding in EMSA. Their relative positions upstream of the ATG codon are indicated. The only two fragments E1/4 and E1/5 binding specifically to proteins in EMSA with tachyzoite nuclear extracts are indicated. The numbers 9, 5b, 7b and 7c represent the probes/competitors described in (C). (B) Electrophoretic band shift assay showing DNA–protein complexes with DNA fragments E1/4 and E1/5 located at the distal promoter region of ENO1. Lane 1, free probe; lane 2, no competitor; lane 3, specific competitor (10-fold excess of the homologous cold fragment); lane 4, specific competitor (50-fold excess); lane 5, unspecific competitor (10-fold excess of ENO1 fragment 2 or E1/2); and lane 6, same unspecific competitor (50-fold excess). The DNA–protein complexes are shown by arrowheads. (C) Gel shift binding assay with fragment 5b at the promoter of ENO1 and the nuclear extract from tachyzoites. Lane 1, free probe; lane 2, no competitor; and lane 3, specific competitor (100-fold excess). Arrowheads show the DNA–protein complexes. Gel shift binding assays with fragments 7b and 7c. Lane 1, free probe; lane 2, no competitor; and lane 3, specific competitor (50-fold or 100-fold excess). DNA–protein complexes with fragment 9. Lane 1, free probe; lane 2, no competitor; lane 3, specific competitor (50-fold excess); and lane 4, specific competitor oligonucleotide (100-fold excess).