Construct of K14-Cath-PR-39 and K14-Cath-mCRAMP transgenic mice. (A and B) Schematic representation of the K14-Cath-PR-39 (A) and K14-Cath-mCRAMP (B) transgene constructs. RT-PCR analysis was performed on total RNA extracted from skin of adult mice. S.S., signal sequence. (C) RT-PCR analysis verifying PR-39 transcription. Lanes: 1, DNA marker; 2, 5, and 8, wild-type littermate; 3, 6, 9, and 4, 7, and 10, two different founder K14-PR-39 transgenic mice, respectively; 2–4, β-actin amplification; 5–7, PR-39 amplification without reverse transcriptase reaction; 8–10, PR-39 amplification. (D) RT-PCR analysis verifying mCRAMP transcription. Lanes: 1, DNA marker; 2, 5, and 8, and 3, 6, and 9, and 4, 7, and 10, three different founder K14-mCRAMP transgenic mice, respectively; 2–4: β-actin amplification; 5–7, mCRAMP amplification without RT reaction; 8–10, mCRAMP amplification. (E and F) Frozen skin sections from day 1 newborn K14-Cath-PR-39 transgenic (E) and wild-type (F) mice fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and processed for immunohistochemical stain by using a polyclonal antibody against PR-39. (×40.) (G) Western blot analysis of protein extracts from wounded wild-type mouse skin (lane 1), wounded K14-Cath-PR-39 transgenic mouse skin (lane 2), pig bone marrow as a control (lane 3), or GAS-infected K14-Cath-PR-39 mouse skin after immunoprecipitation with PR-39 antibody (lane 4). The blot was probed with a polyclonal antibody against PR-39. (H) Quantitative real-time PCR for mCRAMP expression in K14-Cath-mCRAMP mouse skin, compared with their littermate controls. Data are means (±SD) of four mice from each group.