Abstract

By failing to recognize the heterogeneity of hypertension, the authors of the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) study used a faulty premise to conduct a poorly designed clinical trial. By failing to control blood pressures equally across study drug groups, ALLHAT cannot be considered to be a definitive comparative trial. Being neither a monotherapy trial nor a trial that initiated therapy for blood pressure control, ALLHAT provided no data to recommend first-line therapy for hypertension, making the conclusions invalid. Thiazide-type diuretics increase angiotensin II and consequently promote atherosclerosis and arteriolarsclerosis. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers retard atherosclerosis and are nephroprotective. Multiple randomized controlled trials show beneficial clinical outcomes, including cardioprotection and nephroprotection, with the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers. These agents, and not thiazide-type diuretics, should be used as first-line agents to retard the process of atherosclerosis and its clinical outcomes in the setting of arterial hypertension.