Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 Feb;134(1):10-22.

Depressive realism and outcome density bias in contingency judgments: the effect of the context and intertrial interval.

Author information

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, HRT, United Kingdom. r.m.msetfi@herts.ac.uk

Abstract

The perception of the effectiveness of instrumental actions is influenced by depressed mood. Depressive realism (DR) is the claim that depressed people are particularly accurate in evaluating instrumentality. In two experiments, the authors tested the DR hypothesis using an action-outcome contingency judgment task. DR effects were a function of intertrial interval length and outcome density, suggesting that depressed mood is accompanied by reduced contextual processing rather than increased judgment accuracy. The DR effect was observed only when participants were exposed to extended periods in which no actions or outcomes occurred. This implies that DR may result from an impairment in contextual processing rather than accurate but negative expectations. Therefore, DR is consistent with a cognitive distortion view of depression.

((c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved).

PMID:
15702960
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for American Psychological Association
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk