Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

    J R Soc Med. 2005 Feb;98(2):54-8.

    Screening for pulmonary embolism with a D-dimer assay: do we still need to assess clinical probability as well?

    Hammond CJ, Hassan TB.

    Department of Accident and Emergency, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK. doctorhammond@ntlworld.com

    Clinical risk stratification and D-dimer assay can be of use in excluding pulmonary embolism in patients presenting to emergency departments but many D-dimer assays exist and their accuracy varies. We used clinical risk stratification combined with a quantitative latex-agglutination D-dimer assay to screen patients before arranging further imaging if required. Retrospective analysis of a sequential series of 376 patients revealed that no patient with a D-dimer of <275 ng/mL was diagnosed with pulmonary embolism, irrespective of clinical probability. We conclude that a latex-agglutination assay could be used to exclude pulmonary embolism without the necessity for clinical risk stratification. If these findings are borne out by further work, D-dimer strategies to exclude pulmonary embolism could substantially reduce imaging workload.

    PMID: 15684354 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

    PMCID: 1079379

    Supplemental Content

    Click here to read Click here to read