Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Trends Microbiol. 2005 Feb;13(2):58-63.

Can laboratory reference strains mirror "real-world" pathogenesis?

Author information

  • 1Center for Biofilm Engineering, Montana State University, 366 EPS Building - P.O. Box 173980, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA. christophf@erc.montana.edu

Abstract

The extraordinary plasticity of bacterial genomes raises concerns about the adequacy of laboratory-adapted reference strains for the study of "real-world" pathogenesis. Some laboratory strains have been sub-cultured for decades since their first isolation and might have lost important pathophysiological characteristics. Evidence is presented that bacteria rapidly adapt to in vitro conditions. Genomic differences between laboratory reference strains and corresponding low-passage clinical isolates are reviewed. It appears that no bacterial strain can truly represent its species. For DNA microarray and proteomic studies, this limitation might be overcome by the summation of individual genomes to produce a species-specific virtual supragenome.

PMID:
15680764
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk