Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Am J Public Health. 2005 Feb;95(2):286-91.

    Health expenditures for privately insured adults enrolled in managed care gatekeeping vs indemnity plans.

    Source

    Division of General Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, PH 9 East, Room 105, 622 West 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA. pati@email.chop.edu

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVES:

    We assessed the ability of managed care gatekeeping strategies (i.e., requiring a designated primary care provider to authorize referrals) to control health care costs in the mid-1990s.

    METHODS:

    We analyzed expenditure data from 8195 privately insured adults sampled in the nationally representative 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Managed care gatekeeping plan enrollees included those in health maintenance organizations and other plans requiring a primary care gatekeeper. All others were considered indemnity plan enrollees.

    RESULTS:

    In 1996, total per capita annual health expenditures for adult gatekeeping enrollees were about $50 less than those of indemnity enrollees, primarily owing to lower out-of-pocket expenditures. After multivariate adjustment, mean per capita expenditures were approximately 6% lower for gatekeeping enrollees than for indemnity enrollees.

    CONCLUSIONS:

    In the private sector, gatekeeping strategies resulted in modest cost savings over indemnity plans.

    PMID:
    15671466
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    PMCID:
    PMC1449168
    Free PMC Article

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Atypon Icon for PubMed Central

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk