Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
J Occup Environ Med. 2005 Jan;47(1):26-33.

Estimating direct and indirect costs of premenstrual syndrome.

Author information

  • 1Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To quantify the economic impact of premenstrual syndrome (PMS) on the employer.

METHODS:

Data were collected from 374 women aged 18-45 with regular menses. Direct costs were quantified using administrative claims of these patients and the Medicare Fee Schedule. Indirect costs were quantified by both self-reported days of work missed and lost productivity at work. Regression analyses were used to develop a model to project PMS-related direct and indirect costs.

RESULTS:

A total of 29.6% (n = 111) of the participants were diagnosed with PMS. A PMS diagnosis was associated with an average annual increase of $59 in direct costs (P < 0.026) and $4333 in indirect costs per patient (P < 0.0001) compared with patients without PMS.

CONCLUSIONS:

A PMS diagnosis correlated with a modest increase in direct medical costs and a large increase in indirect costs.

PMID:
15643156
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk