Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Psychol Methods. 2004 Dec;9(4):403-25.

Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies.

Author information

  • 1Public Safety and Justice Program, Drug Policy Research Center, RAND Corporation, 201 North Craig Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. danielm@rand.org

Abstract

Causal effect modeling with naturalistic rather than experimental data is challenging. In observational studies participants in different treatment conditions may also differ on pretreatment characteristics that influence outcomes. Propensity score methods can theoretically eliminate these confounds for all observed covariates, but accurate estimation of propensity scores is impeded by large numbers of covariates, uncertain functional forms for their associations with treatment selection, and other problems. This article demonstrates that boosting, a modern statistical technique, can overcome many of these obstacles. The authors illustrate this approach with a study of adolescent probationers in substance abuse treatment programs. Propensity score weights estimated using boosting eliminate most pretreatment group differences and substantially alter the apparent relative effects of adolescent substance abuse treatment.

((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved).

PMID:
15598095
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for American Psychological Association
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk