Vaccination with dl5-29 or gD2 is most effective as prophylaxis for acute, latent, and recurrent infection in guinea pigs. Animals received the vaccines on days 21 and 42 before challenge. On day 0, they were challenged vaginally with HSV-2 strain 333. (A) Virus shedding from the vaginal tract. Significant differences between groups are indicated by ★n. ★1, significantly lower titers on day 2 for dl5-29 recipients than for control animals and pgD2 recipients (each P < 0.01); ★2, significantly lower titers on day 4 for dl5-29 recipients than for dl5-29/pgD2 recipients (P = 0.02); ★3, on day 6, significantly lower titers for dl5-29 recipients than for control mice (P = 0.02), pgD2 mice (P = 0.02), and gD2 recipients (P = 0.01); ★4, on day 8, significantly higher titers for control mice than for dl5-29 and pgD2 mice (P = 0.03 each). (B) Group mean lesion scores during acute disease. Recipients of dl5-29 alone, gD2, and dl5-29/pgD2 had milder acute disease than animals given two doses of pgD2 DNA and control animals (each P < 0.01). (C) Mean cumulative numbers of recurrent lesions. The number of recurrences in recipients of dl5-29 alone, gD2, and dl5-29/pgD2 was significantly lower than that in unvaccinated, control guinea pigs (each, P < 0.001), while recurrences in pgD2 recipients remained higher than those in dl5-29 and gD2 recipients (P = 0.02 and 0.03, respectively). (D) Latent viral DNA loads in pooled sacral ganglia. The broken line indicates the limit of detection of this quantitative PCR assay (6 copies of viral DNA/100 ng of DNA). A viral load of <6 copies was assumed to be 3 copies of viral DNA/100 ng of DNA. The horizontal thick and vertical thin bars show the geometric mean numbers of viral genome copies and SEs, respectively. The viral load in control guinea pigs was significantly higher than that in recipients of dl5-29 alone (P = 0.001), dl5-29/pgD2 (P = 0.01), and gD2 (P < 0.001), while pgD2 recipients had higher viral loads than dl5-29 and gD2 recipients (P = 0.03 and 0.002, respectively). Differences between results for gD2 and dl5-29 recipients were not significant (P = 0.21).