Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Clin Psychol Rev. 2005 Jan;25(1):97-118.

Roots of the Rorschach controversy.

Author information

  • 1Psychology Research Service, Wilford Hall Medical Center, Lackland Air Force Base (AFB), 59 MDOS/MMCPR, 2200 Bergquist Drive, Suite 1, San Antonio, TX 78236-5300, USA. howard.garb@lackland.af.mil

Abstract

The controversy surrounding the Rorschach is updated, and an analysis of its dynamics is offered. Results on normative data and validity are reviewed, followed by a summary of, and rebuttal to, arguments made by Rorschach advocates. We argue that the current controversy can be traced, at least in part, to two unwarranted beliefs. First is the belief that informal impressions and popularity provide dependable evidence for evaluating validity. Second is the belief that Rorschach scores with low individual validity are likely to yield much higher levels of validity if they are interpreted in combination with each other, or with other sources of information, by experts. After presenting historical background information, we show how several arguments made recently in defense of the test reflect these two beliefs, even though they are contradicted by research findings. We conclude that a variety of other divisive conflicts in clinical psychology are related to the inappropriate weight placed on informal and unsystematic impressions relative to systematic research.

PMID:
15596082
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk