Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Ann Behav Med. 2004 Dec;28(3):158-62.

A preliminary study of one year of pedometer self-monitoring.

Author information

  • 1Department of Exercise and Wellness, Arizona Statte University, Mesa, AZ 85212, USA. Tudor-Locke@asu.edu

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Long-term pedometer monitoring has not been attempted.

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this project was to collect 365 days of continuous self-monitored pedometer data to explore the natural variability of physical activity.

METHODS:

Twenty-three participants (7 men, 16 women; M age = 38 +- 9.9 years; M body mass index = 27.7 +- 6.2 kg/m2) were recruited by word of mouth at two southern U.S. universities. Participants were asked to wear pedometers at their waist during waking hours and record steps per day and daily behaviors (e.g., sport/exercise, work or not) on a simple calendar. In total, participants wore pedometers and recorded 8,197 person-days of data (of a possible 8,395 person-days, or 98%) for a mean of 10,090 +- 3,389 steps/day. Missing values were estimated using the Missing Values Analysis EM function in SPSS, Version 11.0.1.

RESULTS:

A mean of 10,082 +- 3,319 steps/day was computed. Using the corrected data, differences in steps/day were significant for season (summer > winter, F = 7.57, p = .001), day of the week (weekday > weekend, F = 3.97, p = .011), type of day (workday vs. nonworkday, F = 9.467, p = .008), and participation in sport/exercise (day with sport/exercise > day without sport/exercise, F = 102.5, p < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS:

These data suggest that surveillance should be conducted in the spring/fall or that an appropriate correction factor should be considered if the intent is to capture values resembling the year-round average.

PMID:
15576253
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk