Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Eval Health Prof. 2004 Dec;27(4):369-82.

On assessing the quality of physicians' clinical judgment: the search for outcome variables.

Author information

  • 1National Board of Medical Examiners, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. hwainer@nbme.org

Abstract

A primary question that must be resolved in the development of tasks to assess the quality of physicians' clinical judgment is, "What is the outcome variable?" One natural choice would seem to be the correctness of the clinical decision. In this article, we use data on the diagnosis of urinary tract infections among young girls to illustrate why, in many clinical situations, this is not a useful variable. We propose instead a judgment weighted by the relative costs of an error. This variable has the disadvantage of requiring expert judgment for scoring, but the advantage of measuring the construct of interest.

PMID:
15492048
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk