Abstract

AIMS:

Recently, some studies revealed the efficacy of pacemaker implantation in decreasing recurrences in patients with vasovagal syncope. As these studies were not blinded or placebo-controlled, the benefits observed might have been due to a bias in the assessment of outcomes or to a placebo effect of the pacemaker. We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in order to ascertain if pacing therapy reduces the risk of syncope relapse.

METHODS AND RESULTS:

Twenty-nine patients (53 +/- 16 years; 19 women) with severe recurrent tilt-induced vasovagal syncope (median 12 syncopes in the lifetime) and 1 syncopal relapse after head-up tilt testing underwent implantation of a pacemaker, and were randomized to pacemaker ON or to pacemaker OFF. During a median of 715 days of follow-up, 8 (50%) patients randomized to pacemaker ON had recurrence of syncope compared to 5 (38%) of patients randomized to pacemaker OFF (p = n.s.); the median time to first syncope was longer in the pacemaker ON than in pacemaker OFF group, although not significantly so (97 [38-144] vs 20 [4-302] days; p = 0.38). There was also no significant difference in the subgroups of patients who had had a mixed response and in those who had had an asystolic response during head-up tilt testing.

CONCLUSION:

Our data were unable to show a superiority of active pacing versus inactive pacing in preventing syncopal recurrence in patients with severe recurrent tilt-induced vasovagal syncope.