Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    J Med Syst. 2004 Aug;28(4):361-70.

    Improving geocoding practices: evaluation of geocoding tools.

    Source

    Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. duckhye@uchicago.edu

    Abstract

    This study examined the sources of error involved in geocoding, by systematically evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of three widely used tools for geocoding. We tested them against a random sample of addresses from a state administrative address master file and found considerable variation in identification of census block geocodes of addresses. This high variation was mainly attributable to differences in preprocessing of addresses before geocoding and the reference street data used for geocoding. Preprocessing includes not only parsing and standardizing, but also correcting addresses against the US Postal Service Zip+4 Database, the master mailing address database maintained and updated regularly by USPS.

    PMID:
    15366241
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk