Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Ann Intern Med. 2004 Sep 7;141(5):352-9.

    Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy.

    Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Choi JR, Schindler WR.

    Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Medical School, E3/311 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792-3252, USA. ppickhardt@mail.radiology.wisc.edu

    Comment in:

    BACKGROUND: Previous estimates of the adenoma miss rate with optical colonoscopy (OC) are hindered by the use of OC as its own reference standard. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency and characteristics of colorectal neoplasms that are missed prospectively on OC by using virtual colonoscopy (VC) as a separate reference standard. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter screening trial. SETTING: 3 medical centers. PARTICIPANTS: 1233 asymptomatic adults who underwent same-day VC and OC. MEASUREMENTS: Colorectal neoplasms (adenomatous polyps) missed at OC before VC results were unblinded. RESULTS: Fourteen (93.3%) of 15 nonrectal neoplasms were located on a fold; 10 (71.4%) of these were located on the backside of a fold. Five (83.3%) of 6 rectal lesions were located within 10 cm of the anal verge. LIMITATIONS: Estimation of the OC miss rate depended on polyp detection on both VC and second-look OC and therefore underestimates the true OC miss rate, particularly for smaller polyps. CONCLUSIONS: Most clinically significant adenomas missed prospectively on OC are located behind a fold or near the anal verge. The 12% OC miss rate for large adenomas (>or=10 mm) when state-of-the-art 3-dimensional VC is used as a separate reference standard is increased from the previous 0% to 6% estimates derived by using OC as its own reference standard.

    PMID: 15353426 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

    Supplemental Content

    Click here to read