Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    J Perinat Med. 2004;32(4):308-14.

    Waterbirths compared with landbirths: an observational study of nine years.

    Source

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cantonal Hospital, Frauenfeld, Switzerland. verena.geissbuehler@stgag.ch

    Abstract

    AIMS:

    This study compares neonatal and maternal morbidity and mortality between waterbirths and landbirths (spontaneous singleton births in cephalic presentation, vacuum extractions are excluded).

    METHODS:

    In this observational study covering nine years, standardized questionnaires were used to document 9,518 spontaneous singleton cephalic presentation births, of which 3,617 were waterbirths and 5,901 landbirths.

    RESULTS:

    Landbirths show higher rates of episiotomies as well as third and fourth degree perineal lacerations. Waterbirths show a higher rate of births "without injuries", first and second-degree perineal lacerations, vaginal and labial tears. After a waterbirth, there is an average loss of 5.26 g/l blood; this is significantly less than landbirths where there is an 8.08 g/l blood loss on average. In 69.7% waterbirths required no analgesic, compared to 58.0% for landbirths. Water and landbirths do not differ with respect to maternal and neonatal infections. After landbirths, there was a higher rate of newborn complications with subsequent transfer to an external NICU. During the study, there were neither maternal nor neonatal deaths related to spontaneous labor.

    CONCLUSIONS:

    Waterbirths are associated with low risks for both mother and child when obstetrical guidelines are followed.

    PMID:
    15346814
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk