Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Trends Genet. 2004 Sep;20(9):439-44.

Meta-analysis of genetic association studies.

Author information

  • 1Cancer Research UK GPRG, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Radcliffe Infirmary, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK. marcus.munafo@clinpharm.ox.ac.uk

Abstract

Meta-analysis, a statistical tool for combining results across studies, is becoming popular as a method for resolving discrepancies in genetic association studies. Persistent difficulties in obtaining robust, replicable results in genetic association studies are almost certainly because genetic effects are small, requiring studies with many thousands of subjects to be detected. In this article, we describe how meta-analysis works and consider whether it will solve the problem of underpowered studies or whether it is another affliction visited by statisticians on geneticists. We show that meta-analysis has been successful in revealing unexpected sources of heterogeneity, such as publication bias. If heterogeneity is adequately recognized and taken into account, meta-analysis can confirm the involvement of a genetic variant, but it is not a substitute for an adequately powered primary study.

Comment in

PMID:
15313553
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk