Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Clin Rehabil. 2004 Aug;18(5):463-82.

    Rehabilitation for Parkinson's disease: a systematic review of available evidence.

    Source

    Department of Economics, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, UK. H.Gage@surrey.ac.uk

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE:

    To systematically review the available evidence on the effectiveness of nonpharmacological rehabilitation interventions for people with Parkinson's disease, and identify future research needs.

    DESIGN:

    Electronic searches of four databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PsychLIT) 1980-2002; examination of reference lists of relevant papers. Controlled trials and observational studies were included. Data extraction and quality assessment of papers by two independent reviewers. A narrative review.

    SETTING:

    Rehabilitation interventions delivered either in subjects' own homes, or in clinical settings as outpatients.

    SUBJECTS:

    Community-living adults with Parkinson's disease.

    INTERVENTIONS:

    Physiotherapy, occupational therapy, speech and language therapy, psychological counselling and support, and education.

    MAIN MEASURES:

    A range of outcomes: mobility, functional status, speech, swallowing, psychological well-being, as determined by the studies included in the review.

    RESULTS:

    Forty-four different studies (reported in 51 papers) were included (25 physiotherapy, 4 occupational therapy, 10 speech and language therapy, 3 psychological counselling, 1 educational, 1 multidisciplinary). All studies, except one, reported improvements on at least one outcome measure.

    CONCLUSIONS:

    Findings may reflect publication bias, but suggest interventions can affect patients' lives for the better in a variety of ways. It is difficult to interpret the clinical importance of statistically significant improvements reported in most studies. There is a need for methodologically more robust research with meaningful follow-up periods, designed in a manner that separates specific and nonspecific effects. Cost-effectiveness evidence is required to provide clear guidance on service extensions.

    PMID:
    15293481
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Click here to read

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk