Your browser version may not work well with NCBI's Web applications. More information
here...
-
A phase II, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose comparative study of the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of MCC-135 in subjects with chronic heart failure, NYHA class II/III (MCC-135-GO1 study): rationale and design.
Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Gazes Cardiac Research Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, and the Ralph H. Johnson, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, 29425, USA.
BACKGROUND: Chronic heart failure (CHF) can be caused either by a predominant abnormality in systolic function (systolic heart failure) or a predominant abnormality in diastolic function (diastolic heart failure). Randomized clinical trials have identified a number of pharmaceutical agents that can reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with systolic heart failure. Despite significant therapeutic advances, systolic heart failure continues to result in high rates of morbidity and mortality. In contrast to systolic heart failure, no randomized clinical trials have been performed in patients with diastolic heart failure. Common to the mechanisms causing both systolic and diastolic heart failure are abnormalities in calcium homeostasis. Mitsubishi Pharma Corporation has developed a compound (MCC-135, INN; caldaret) whose mechanism of action is proposed to be modulation of calcium homeostasis at the sarcoplasmic reticulum and cellular membrane. The purpose of this study was to test the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of MCC-135 in patients with mild to moderate heart failure. METHODS: This was a phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study of parallel group design comparing 3 oral dose regimens of MCC-135 (5 mg, 25 mg, 50 mg, twice daily) with a placebo control. The treatment period was 24 weeks. A total of 511 patients were recruited from 69 centers in the United States and Europe. One hundred and twenty-five patients were recruited in each of the 4 treatment groups. Patients in each treatment group were divided into 2 cohorts: those with an ejection fraction < or = 40%, and those with an ejection fraction >40% as determined by core laboratory analysis of echocardiographic studies. CONCLUSION: Patient recruitment was completed in September 2002. Patient follow-up was completed by February 2003; the results will be available for release in 2004.
PMID: 15190528 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
-
Related Articles
-
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of intravenous MCC-135 as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Evaluation of MCC-135 for left ventricular salvage in acute myocardial infarction (EVOLVE).
[Am Heart J. 2008]
-
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of intravenous MCC-135 as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the evaluation of MCC-135 for left ventricular salvage in acute MI (EVOLVE) study.
[J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2005]
-
Rationale and design of the enoximone clinical trials program.
[J Card Fail. 2005]
-
ISA 247: trans-ISA 247, trans-R 1524, ISA(TX)247, ISAtx 247, ISATx247, LX 211, LX211, R 1524, R-1524.
[Drugs R D. 2007]
-
Mortality and morbidity reduction with Candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction: results of the CHARM low-left ventricular ejection fraction trials.
[Circulation. 2004]
-
ยป See all Related Articles...