Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
    Ann Intern Med. 2004 Apr 6;140(7):533-7.

    Vitamin C pharmacokinetics: implications for oral and intravenous use.

    Source

    National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the National Cancer Institut, and the Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1372, USA.

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND:

    Vitamin C at high concentrations is toxic to cancer cells in vitro. Early clinical studies of vitamin C in patients with terminal cancer suggested clinical benefit, but 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled trials showed none. However, these studies used different routes of administration.

    OBJECTIVE:

    To determine whether plasma vitamin C concentrations vary substantially with the route of administration.

    DESIGN:

    Dose concentration studies and pharmacokinetic modeling.

    SETTING:

    Academic medical center.

    PARTICIPANTS:

    17 healthy hospitalized volunteers.

    MEASUREMENTS:

    Vitamin C plasma and urine concentrations were measured after administration of oral and intravenous doses at a dose range of 0.015 to 1.25 g, and plasma concentrations were calculated for a dose range of 1 to 100 g.

    RESULTS:

    Peak plasma vitamin C concentrations were higher after administration of intravenous doses than after administration of oral doses (P < 0.001), and the difference increased according to dose. Vitamin C at a dose of 1.25 g administered orally produced mean (+/-sd) peak plasma concentrations of 134.8 +/- 20.6 micromol/L compared with 885 +/- 201.2 micromol/L for intravenous administration. For the maximum tolerated oral dose of 3 g every 4 hours, pharmacokinetic modeling predicted peak plasma vitamin C concentrations of 220 micromol/L and 13 400 micromol/L for a 50-g intravenous dose. Peak predicted urine concentrations of vitamin C from intravenous administration were 140-fold higher than those from maximum oral doses.

    LIMITATIONS:

    Patient data are not available to confirm pharmacokinetic modeling at high doses and in patients with cancer.

    CONCLUSIONS:

    Oral vitamin C produces plasma concentrations that are tightly controlled. Only intravenous administration of vitamin C produces high plasma and urine concentrations that might have antitumor activity. Because efficacy of vitamin C treatment cannot be judged from clinical trials that use only oral dosing, the role of vitamin C in cancer treatment should be reevaluated.

    Comment in

    PMID:
    15068981
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Silverchair Information Systems

      Save items

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk