Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Apr;36(4):731-5.

Comparison of Bod Pod and DXA in female collegiate athletes.

Author information

  • 1South Dakota State University, Department of HPER, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

This study was designed to evaluate the reliability and validity of air displacement plethysmography (ADP) compared with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) Hologic QDR 4500A (Waltham, MA) in female collegiate athletes.

METHODS:

Forty-seven females representing various Division II collegiate sports and 24 controls participated in the current study. All women underwent both methods of testing within a 30-min period.

RESULTS:

Comparison of means indicated that the ADP and DXA are not different when measuring body fat (BF%) in the athletes (ADP = 22.5 +/- 5.5%, DXA = 22.0 +/- 4.7%P = 1.0). Furthermore, this study determined that ADP is a reliable measure of body fat (BF%; r = 0.96, P < 0.001; 0.97, P < 0.001) in collegiate female athletes and nonathletes, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

The results from this study indicate that ADP is a valid measure of body composition in female athletes and nonathletes when compared with DXA.

PMID:
15064602
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk