Display Settings:


Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Jan;57(1):30-9.

The value of the CAGE in screening for alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence in general clinical populations: a diagnostic meta-analysis.

Author information

  • 1Department of General Practice, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Katholicke Universiteit Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, Blok J, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. bert.aertgeerts@med.kuleuven.ac.be



To perform a meta-analysis to assess diagnostic characteristics of the CAGE in screening for alcohol abuse or dependence in a general clinical population and to test a new method for pooling of ROC curves.


Medline search performed over the period 1/1/1974 to 31/12/2001.


Calculation of diagnostic values.


We identified 35 articles using the DSM criteria as the gold standard to test the diagnostic value of the CAGE. Only 10 studies could be included for the meta-analysis. With a cutoff point > or =2, the pooled sensitivity is far better in inpatients (0.87) than in primary care patients (0.71) or ambulatory patients (0.60). The pooled specificity also differs for each group. The likelihood ratios seem to be relatively constant over the populations (overall LR+:3.44;LR-:0.18). We calculated a pooled AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.85-0.89). At low specificity values, the sensitivity was homogeneous over the studies, and at a low sensitivity, the specificity was heterogeneous.


The diagnostic value of the CAGE is of limited value using this test for screening purposes at his recommended cutpoint of > or =2.

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Health
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk