Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Am J Hum Genet. 2004 Feb;74(2):317-25. Epub 2004 Jan 21.

Matching strategies for genetic association studies in structured populations.

Author information

  • 1Perlegen Sciences, Mountain View, CA, 94043, USA. David_Hinds@perlegen.com

Abstract

Association studies in populations that are genetically heterogeneous can yield large numbers of spurious associations if population subgroups are unequally represented among cases and controls. This problem is particularly acute for studies involving pooled genotyping of very large numbers of single-nucleotide-polymorphism (SNP) markers, because most methods for analysis of association in structured populations require individual genotyping data. In this study, we present several strategies for matching case and control pools to have similar genetic compositions, based on ancestry information inferred from genotype data for approximately 300 SNPs tiled on an oligonucleotide-based genotyping array. We also discuss methods for measuring the impact of population stratification on an association study. Results for an admixed population and a phenotype strongly confounded with ancestry show that these simple matching strategies can effectively mitigate the impact of population stratification.

PMID:
14740319
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC1181929
Free PMC Article

Images from this publication.See all images (5)Free text

Figure  1
Figure  2
Figure  3
Figure  4
Figure  5
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk