[Sensitivity of abdominal radiography without preparation compared with computed tomography in the assessment of residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy]

Prog Urol. 2003 Sep;13(4):581-4.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Introduction: Evaluation of possible residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy is an essential aspect of the management of stone disease. The results of this evaluation determine the therapeutic approach, follow-up and presumed duration of treatment. The imaging modalities most frequently used are non-enhanced spiral computed tomography and plain abdominal x-ray. The objective of this study was to evaluate the contribution of spiral CT to the immediate follow-up of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Material and methods: Over a period of two years, we prospectively included 50 patients in whom plain abdominal x-ray and spiral CT were performed on the first postoperative day after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The diagnosis of residual fragments was based on these examinations by 2 independent radiologists.

Results: The sensitivity for the detection of residual fragments was 87% for plain abdominal x-ray compared 100% for computed tomography. 89% of the fragments not diagnosed by plain abdominal x-ray were less than 5 min.

Conclusion: Plain abdominal x-ray was insufficient for the diagnosis of small residual fragments. Spiral CT is justified to confirm the absence of residual fragments in a patient after percutaneous nephrolithotomy despite the higher cost and irradiation compared to plain abdominal x-ray.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Kidney Calculi / diagnostic imaging*
  • Kidney Calculi / surgery*
  • Kidney Calices*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nephrostomy, Percutaneous*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Radiography, Abdominal*
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed*