Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Lab Anim. 2003 Oct;37(4):341-51.

Comparison of the sensitivity of in vivo antibody production tests with in vitro PCR-based methods to detect infectious contamination of biological materials.

Author information

  • 1Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, University of Zurich, Switzerland. frank.bootz@access.unizh.ch

Abstract

Bacteria and viruses may be transmitted to laboratory rodents by contaminated biological materials such as transplantable tumours, cell lines, sera or other biological materials. Biological materials are currently being screened using the mouse or rat antibody production (MAP/RAP) test (serological testing). We decided to test and validate an alternative assay using polymerase chain reaction (PCR/realtime PCR) technology to detect viral contamination directly in biological material. The aim of this study therefore is the validation of our new PCR assays and the comparison of PCR and the MAP test. For 8/14 viruses, conventional PCR was more sensitive and more specific than the MAP test in detecting murine viruses. For 12/14 viruses, the realtime PCR was more sensitive than the MAP test. In 2/14 cases, all three detection methods had the same sensitivity. Furthermore, PCR screening clearly conforms to the principles of the 3Rs as a replacement technique because it eliminates the need for using animals to screen for murine viruses in biological material.

PMID:
14609003
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk