Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
BMJ. 2003 Oct 4;327(7418):785-9.

Evidence for risk of bias in cluster randomised trials: review of recent trials published in three general medical journals.

Author information

  • 1York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, York University, York YO10 5DD.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To examine the prevalence of a risk of bias associated with the design and conduct of cluster randomised controlled trials among a sample of recently published studies.

DESIGN:

Retrospective review of cluster randomised trials published in the BMJ, Lancet, and New England Journal of Medicine from January 1997 to October 2002.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

Prevalence of secure randomisation of clusters, identification of participants before randomisation (to avoid foreknowledge of allocation), differential recruitment between treatment arms, differential application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, and differential attrition.

RESULTS:

Of the 36 trials identified, 24 were published in the BMJ,11 in the Lancet, and a single trial in the New England Journal of Medicine. At the cluster level, 15 (42%) trials provided evidence for secure allocation and 25 (69%) used stratified allocation. Few trials showed evidence of imbalance at the cluster level. However, some evidence of susceptibility to risk of bias at the individual level existed in 14 (39%) studies.

CONCLUSIONS:

Some recently published cluster randomised trials may not have taken adequate precautions to guard against threats to the internal validity of their design.

PMID:
14525877
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC214092
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk