Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
CMAJ. 2003 Sep 30;169(7):677-80.

Letters, numbers, symbols and words: how to communicate grades of evidence and recommendations.

Author information

  • 1Department of Medicine, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. hjs@buffalo.edu

Erratum in

  • CMAJ. 2004 Mar 30;170(7):1082.

Abstract

The GRADE Working Group is developing and evaluating a common, sensible approach to grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in health care. In this article, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using letters, numbers, symbols or words to represent grades of evidence and recommendations. Using multiple strategies, we searched for comparative studies of alternative ways of representing ordered categories in any context. In addition, we contacted experts and reviewed theoretical work and qualitative research on how best to communicate grades of any kind quickly and clearly. We were unable to identify health care research that addressed, either directly or indirectly, the best way to present grades of evidence and recommendations. We found examples of symbols used by government, commercial and consumer organizations to communicate quality of evidence or strength of recommendations, but no comparative studies. Although a number of grading systems are used in health care and other fields, there is little or no evidence of how well various presentations are understood. Before promoting the use of specific symbols, numbers, letters or words, the extent to which the intended message is comprehended should be evaluated.

PMID:
14517128
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC202287
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk