Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Genet Med. 2003 Sep-Oct;5(5):353-63.

    An economic viewpoint on alternative strategies for identifying persons with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

    Source

    Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

    Abstract

    PURPOSE:

    There is uncertainty regarding the optimal strategy for identifying mutation carriers among those with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC).

    METHODS:

    We used decision analysis to compare the cost-effectiveness of 4 strategies among those with newly diagnosed colon cancer: (1) clinical and family history followed by microsatellite instability testing and germline testing (Bethesda guidelines); (2) universal microsatellite instability testing; (3) germline testing of those who meet clinical and family history criteria; and (4) universal germline testing.

    RESULTS:

    The added cost per year of life saved (YLS) for each strategy was as follows: (1) 11,865 US dollars/YLS, (2) 35,617 US dollars/YLS, (3) 49,702 US dollars/YLS, and (4) 267,548 US dollars/YLS.

    CONCLUSIONS:

    The Bethesda guidelines are the most cost-effectiveness approach to screen persons for HNPCC.

    PMID:
    14501830
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    PMCID:
    PMC2692576
    Free PMC Article

    Images from this publication.See all images (3) Free text

    Fig. 1
    Fig. 3
    Fig. 2

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Nature Publishing Group Icon for PubMed Central

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk