Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Anesthesiology. 1992 Nov;77(5):888-98.

Effects of isoflurane and nitrous oxide in subanesthetic concentrations on memory and responsiveness in volunteers.

Author information

  • 1Department of Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0648.

Abstract

Awareness, defined as conscious memory during anesthesia, has been a problem in anesthesia practice. To determine the effect of isoflurane and nitrous oxide (N2O) on memory, 17 healthy adult volunteers were randomly assigned to receive isoflurane or N2O and received the alternate agent 1-2 weeks later. Each volunteer was studied at four end-tidal concentrations of each agent, consecutively 0.15, 0.3, 0.45, and 0.15 times the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) for isoflurane or 0.3, 0.45, 0.6, and 0.3 times MAC for N2O. After 15-min equilibration at each end-tidal concentration, volunteers were tested for voluntary response to command and were presented with verbal information to be recalled after anesthesia. Volunteers were interviewed on the day after the study and tested for conscious and unconscious memory of the information presented during anesthetic administration. MAC-awake (the end-tidal concentration preventing voluntary response in 50% of volunteers) was 0.38 (0.35-0.42) times MAC for isoflurane and 0.64 (0.61-0.68) MAC for N2O (means, 95% confidence limits), indicating isoflurane to be more potent than N2O in suppressing voluntary response (P = .0001). Memory data were analyzed in 12 volunteers who completed the study and in whom the allocation of information to be recalled was counterbalanced among agents and concentrations of agents. Memory was decreased by increasing concentrations of both agents. Conscious memory of the information presented during anesthetic administration was prevented by 0.45 MAC isoflurane but not completely prevented by 0.6 MAC N2O. Unconscious memory (defined as memory of information without conscious recognition) occurred during administration of both agents and was prevented by 0.45 MAC isoflurane but not by 0.6 MAC N2O. Isoflurane was more potent in suppressing memory than MAC-equivalent concentrations of N2O. Using models of the relationship between dose of agent and suppression of memory, a dose of both agents was estimated that suppressed memory by 50% (ED50). The ED50 was 0.20 MAC for isoflurane (95% confidence intervals, 0.15-0.25), and 0.50 MAC for N2O (95% confidence intervals 0.43-0.55). We conclude that isoflurane and N2O suppress memory in a dose-dependent manner, and that isoflurane is more potent in preventing memory and voluntary response to command than MAC-equivalent concentrations of N2O.

PMID:
1443742
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk