Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
    CMAJ. 1992 Oct 15;147(8):1177-84.

    Sexual assault tracking study: who gets lost to follow-up?

    Source

    Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVES:

    To determine whether loss to follow-up can be predicted in patients who present to an emergency sexual assault assessment service and to generate hypotheses regarding the prediction of loss to follow-up on the basis of patient characteristics, assault characteristics and the services provided.

    DESIGN:

    Prospective, exploratory study.

    SETTING:

    Emergency department functioning as a regional sexual assault centre in a tertiary care hospital.

    PATIENTS:

    All 294 women over the age of 16 years who presented to the emergency department with a complaint of sexual assault and consented to be followed up.

    INTERVENTIONS:

    Telephone interviews at 24 to 48 hours and 1 month after presentation; face-to-face interviews after 1 week, 3 months and 6 months.

    MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

    Follow-up status (tracked versus lost to follow-up), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Y), Beck Depression Scale (Beck) and Rape Trauma Symptom Rating Scale (RTSRS).

    RESULTS:

    At 24 to 48 hours 136 (46%) of the patients could not be reached. Only 61 (21%) were still tracked at 6 months. Loss to follow-up at 1 month accurately predicted loss to follow-up at 6 months in 209 (98%) of 214 patients. For tracked patients the STAI-Y and Beck scores improved over 6 months. These scores at 1 week did not predict follow-up status at 6 months, but the numbers were small. Subjects with a higher RTSRS score at 24 to 48 hours were most likely to remain tracked throughout the 6 months.

    CONCLUSIONS:

    Decisions regarding how vigorously to track patients with a complaint of sexual assault can tentatively be based on the characteristics of the victim and of the assault. We hypothesize that the characteristics predicting loss to follow-up include denial and avoidance behaviour, lack of a telephone number or forwarding address, history of a psychiatric condition, a disability (e.g., deafness), characterization as a "street person," a high degree of violence or injury in the assault, and threat by the assailant. Although a predictive model requires further data, crisis intervention services in an emergency department are essential, given the large number of patients lost to follow-up.

    PMID:
    1393931
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    PMCID:
    PMC1336483
    Free PMC Article

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for PubMed Central

      Save items

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk