Comparison of two methods for the removal of root canal posts

Quintessence Int. 2003 Jul-Aug;34(7):534-6.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the application of ultrasound with the use of an engine-driven trephine bur to remove parallel-sided root canal posts.

Method and materials: Single-rooted human canine teeth were decoronated and prepared to receive preformed titanium posts. The posts were cemented with Panavia F resin cement. Ten teeth acted as controls, 10 had a 4-mm-deep gutter cut around the post using a Masserann trephining bur, and 10 were subjected to 10 minutes of ultrasound. The forces required to dislodge the posts were determined using a universal testing machine, and the data were analyzed using analysis of variance.

Results: The only significant difference was between the trephined and ultrasonically energized groups, with the ultrasonic group requiring greater forces for dislodgement.

Conclusion: Resin composite cement could be removed from around the posts with the trephine bur but with considerable difficulty, and neither method of dislodging the posts was effective.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Analysis of Variance
  • Cementation
  • Cuspid
  • Dental Debonding / methods*
  • Humans
  • Post and Core Technique / instrumentation*
  • Resin Cements / chemistry
  • Root Canal Preparation / instrumentation
  • Stress, Mechanical
  • Tensile Strength
  • Titanium
  • Ultrasonics

Substances

  • Panavia-Fluoro
  • Resin Cements
  • Titanium