Comment in

• Can anyone authorize the nontherapeutic permanent alteration of a child's body? [Am J Bioeth. 2003]
  Can anyone authorize the nontherapeutic permanent alteration of a child's body?Hill G. Am J Bioeth. 2003 Spring; 3(2):W6.
• Male neonatal circumcision: ritual or public-health imperative. [Am J Bioeth. 2003]
  Male neonatal circumcision: ritual or public-health imperative.Batzer FR, Hurwitz JM. Am J Bioeth. 2003 Spring; 3(2):W10.
• Respect for bodily integrity: a Catholic perspective on circumcision in Catholic hospitals. [Am J Bioeth. 2003]
  Respect for bodily integrity: a Catholic perspective on circumcision in Catholic hospitals.Fadel P. Am J Bioeth. 2003 Spring; 3(2):W9.
• Cultural bias in responses to male and female genital surgeries. [Am J Bioeth. 2003]
  Cultural bias in responses to male and female genital surgeries.Davis DS. Am J Bioeth. 2003 Spring; 3(2):W5.
• Circumcision as human-rights violation: assessing Benatar and Benatar. [Am J Bioeth. 2003]
  Circumcision as human-rights violation: assessing Benatar and Benatar.Cruz R, Travis JW, Glick LB. Am J Bioeth. 2003 Spring; 3(2):W7.
• Nontherapeutic circumcision is ethically bankrupt. [Am J Bioeth. 2003]
  Nontherapeutic circumcision is ethically bankrupt.Hampton WF. Am J Bioeth. 2003 Spring; 3(2):W8.
• Cutting history, cutting culture: female circumcision in the United States. [Am J Bioeth. 2003]
  Cutting history, cutting culture: female circumcision in the United States.Webber S, Schonfeld T. Am J Bioeth. 2003 Spring; 3(2):65-6.
• What is mutilation? [Am J Bioeth. 2003]
  What is mutilation?Lund-Molfese NC. Am J Bioeth. 2003 Spring; 3(2):64-5.
• The ethics of neonatal male circumcision: a Catholic perspective. [Am J Bioeth. 2003]
  The ethics of neonatal male circumcision: a Catholic perspective.Slosar JP, O'Brien D. Am J Bioeth. 2003 Spring; 3(2):62-4.
• Male circumcision, religious preferences, and the question of harm. [Am J Bioeth. 2003]
  Male circumcision, religious preferences, and the question of harm.Sheldon M. Am J Bioeth. 2003 Spring; 3(2):61-2.
• Neonatal male circumcision: ethical issues and physician responsibility. [Am J Bioeth. 2003]
  Neonatal male circumcision: ethical issues and physician responsibility.Jones CM. Am J Bioeth. 2003 Spring; 3(2):59-60.
• Physician obligation, cultural factors, and neonatal male circumcision. [Am J Bioeth. 2003]
  Physician obligation, cultural factors, and neonatal male circumcision.Ford PJ. Am J Bioeth. 2003 Spring; 3(2):58-9.
• Social norm theory and male circumcision: why parents circumcise. [Am J Bioeth. 2003]
  Social norm theory and male circumcision: why parents circumcise.Waldeck SE. Am J Bioeth. 2003 Spring; 3(2):56-7.
• Standards for family decisions: replacing best interests with harm prevention. [Am J Bioeth. 2003]
  Standards for family decisions: replacing best interests with harm prevention.Dresser R. Am J Bioeth. 2003 Spring; 3(2):54-5.
• I paid out-of-pocket for my son's circumcision at Happy Valley Tattoo and Piercing: alternative framings of the debate over routine neonatal male circumcision. [Am J Bioeth. 2003]
  I paid out-of-pocket for my son's circumcision at Happy Valley Tattoo and Piercing: alternative framings of the debate over routine neonatal male circumcision.Antommaria AH. Am J Bioeth. 2003 Spring; 3(2):50-2.
• Circumcision--a Victorian relic lacking ethical, medical, or legal justification. [Am J Bioeth. 2003]
  Circumcision--a Victorian relic lacking ethical, medical, or legal justification.Svoboda JS. Am J Bioeth. 2003 Spring; 3(2):52-4.
• Who speaks for sons? [Am J Bioeth. 2003]
  Who speaks for sons?Mullen MA. Am J Bioeth. 2003 Spring; 3(2):49-50.