Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
Am Nat. 2003 Aug;162(2):172-81. Epub 2003 Jul 16.

Evolution of trophic transmission in parasites: why add intermediate hosts?

Author information

  • 1Centre d'Etude sur le Polymorphisme des Microorganismes, Unité Mixte de Recherche, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Centre IRD, 911 Avenue Agropolis, BP 64501, 34394, Montpellier Cedex 5, France.

Abstract

Although multihost complex life cycles (CLCs) are common in several distantly related groups of parasites, their evolution remains poorly understood. In this article, we argue that under particular circumstances, adding a second host to a single-host life cycle is likely to enhance transmission (i.e., reaching the target host). For instance, in several situations, the propagules of a parasite exploiting a predator species will achieve a higher host-finding success by encysting in a prey of the target predator than by other dispersal modes. In such a case, selection should favor the transition from a single- to a two-host life cycle that includes the prey species as an intermediate host. We use an optimality model to explore this idea, and we discuss it in relation to dispersal strategies known among free-living species, especially animal dispersal. The model found that selection favored a complex life cycle only if intermediate hosts were more abundant than definitive hosts. The selective value of a complex life cycle increased with predation rates by definitive hosts on intermediate hosts. In exploring trade-offs between transmission strategies, we found that more costly trade-offs made it more difficult to evolve a CLC while less costly trade-offs between traits could favor a mixed strategy.

PMID:
12858262
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for University of Chicago Press
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk