Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Br J Dermatol. 2003 Jun;148(6):1089-93.

Metal sensitivities and orthopaedic implants revisited: the potential for metal allergy with the new metal-on-metal joint prostheses.

Author information

  • Department of Dermatology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK. david.gawkrodger@sth.nhs.uk

Abstract

The potential of metal-containing orthopaedic prostheses to induce problems through metal allergy taxes dermatologists and orthopaedic surgeons alike. Metal-on-plastic joint replacements are not thought to induce metal allergy but wear products, principally polypropylene particles, produce a foreign body reaction in bone and may lead to aseptic loosening of the joint. Orthopaedic surgeons are increasingly using metal-on-metal joint replacements, particularly for younger patients, as some evidence suggests that there is less wear debris and hence less aseptic loosening. The original metal-on-metal hip joints of the 1960s were associated with sensitivities to cobalt, nickel and chromate when loosening occurred. The potential for modern metal-on-metal joint prostheses, with their lower production of wear debris, to sensitize the recipient to metals or to induce a problem in subjects already allergic to metals, is unclear. One uncontrolled series suggested an association between nickel allergy and prosthesis loosening in some subjects, but the question has yet to be addressed in a prospective study and to date there is no other observation in the orthopaedic literature to suggest a problem.

PMID:
12828734
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Blackwell Publishing
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk