Biomechanical comparison of five external wrist fixators

Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2002;61(1-2):40-4.

Abstract

The relative stiffness of five different external wrist fixators currently in use for distal radius fractures was determined using a uniform fracture model consisting of wood dowels to isolate the effects of the fixators themselves. Each construct was loaded in axial compression, eccentric and cantilever modes of bending, and torsion. The stiffest of the fixators varied by a factor of three in compression, five in bending, and three in torsion. Although the ideal stiffness of a wrist fixator is unknown, there is a large variation in the stiffness of existing devices.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Compressive Strength
  • Elasticity
  • Equipment Design
  • External Fixators / standards*
  • Humans
  • Materials Testing
  • Radius Fractures / therapy*
  • Tensile Strength
  • Torque
  • Weight-Bearing
  • Wrist Injuries / therapy*