Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
ScientificWorldJournal. 2002 May 8;2:1247-53.

Genotoxicity studies in groundwater, surface waters, and contaminated soil.

Author information

  • 1Vito, Environmental Toxicology, Boeretang 200, B-2400 Mol, Belgium. luc.verschaeve@vito.be

Abstract

It is at present considered important to include biological tests in measuring programmes of environmental samples to supplement the chemical and physical parameters that are currently used. A battery of tests is therefore necessary, also within a given "endpoint" (e.g., genotoxicity), because one single test will not give all the answers to our questions. As it is not possible to include all available tests in routine screening programmes, a selection of tests should be made. According to comparative investigations, the bacterial Ames test remains very important. When no preconcentration step is involved, other bacterial tests (e.g., the umu-C and VITOTOX tests) may be recommended. The comet assay may be used in Daphnia or human white blood cells. Further validations, comparisons, mechanistic investigations, etc. remain necessary as differences are often found between the tests that are not solely explained by differences in genetic endpoint and that therefore should further be investigated and understood.

PMID:
12805908
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Hindawi Publishing Corporation
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk