Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Science. 2003 Jul 18;301(5631):358-60. Epub 2003 Jun 12.

Estimating the rock volume bias in paleobiodiversity studies.

Author information

  • 1Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences, Post Office Box 30-368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand. j.crampton@gns.cri.nz

Abstract

To interpret changes in biodiversity through geological time, it is necessary first to correct for biases in sampling effort related to variations in the exposure of rocks and recovery of fossils with age. Data from New Zealand indicate that outcrop area is likely to be a reliable proxy of rock volume in both stable cratonic regions, where the paleobiodiversity record is strongly correlated with relative sea level, and on tectonically active margins. In contrast, another potential proxy, the number of rock formations, is a poor predictor of outcrop area or sampling effort in the New Zealand case.

Comment in

PMID:
12805555
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk