Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Gynecol Oncol. 2003 Jun;89(3):424-8.

Strength of correlations between colposcopic impression and biopsy histology.

Author information

  • 1Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southern Illinois University, Springfield, IL 62794, USA. LSMASSAD@ameritech.net

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to determine the strength of the correlation between colposcopic impression and biopsy histology.

METHODS:

In an urban referral clinic, colposcopy and directed biopsy were performed between July 1, 1996, and December 31, 1999, by residents supervised by board-certified attending obstetrician-gynecologists. Impression and biopsy were graded as benign, suggesting condyloma or koilocytosis, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grades 1-3, or cancer. The significance of association was assessed by chi(2) testing and the strength by kappa statistics.

RESULTS:

Colposcopies were performed on 2825 women, with colposcopic impression and biopsy grade known for 2112. Exact agreement was found in only 893 (37%) women, but results agreed within one grade in 1203 (75%). The association between impression and histology was significant (P < 0.001), but the strength of the correlation was poor (0.20). The positive predictive value of any colposcopic abnormality for any histologic abnormality was 80%. The negative predictive value of a benign colposcopic impression was 68%. The sensitivity of colposcopy with a threshold of any lesion detected was 89%, and the specificity was 52%. The sensitivity for CIN 2/3 was 56%.

CONCLUSION:

Colposcopy is imprecise, although useful in estimating lesion grade. Management decisions require biopsy.

PMID:
12798706
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk