Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
Med J Aust. 2003 Feb 17;178(4):178-9.

Medical history and medical practice: persistent myths about the foreskin.

Author information

  • robjld@webone.com.au

Abstract

Although many 19th-century misconceptions about the foreskin have been dispelled since it was shown that infantile phimosis was not an abnormality, the ideas that ritual or religious circumcision arose as a hygiene measure, and that circumcision makes no difference to sexual response, have persisted. The first idea should be dismissed as a myth and the second has been seriously questioned by modern research.

PMID:
12580747
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Australasian Medical Publishing Company
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk