Sexual dimorphism in trauma? A retrospective evaluation of outcome

Injury. 2003 Jan;34(1):27-31. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(02)00018-9.

Abstract

Purpose: Multiple studies have demonstrated a heightened immune response in female animals subjected to trauma-hemorrhage models and have implied a subsequent survival advantage.

Procedures: A retrospective review of outcome in 15,170 trauma admissions over a 5-year-period (1993-1997) at a level 1-trauma center was performed. A comparison of outcome by gender, age, injury severity score (ISS), mechanism of injury, location of injury (AIS), and length of hospitalization (intensive care unit and total hospitalization) was performed.

Findings: There were 12,456 male and 2714 female patients included in the study. Overall survival rates (male = 90.2%, female = 90.8%) and survival of serious (ISS > or = 15) trauma (male = 63.5%, female = 60.5%) were not statistically different. Logistic regression analysis identified age, mechanism and ISS as factors associated with survival.

Conclusion: Retrospective evaluation of our trauma population failed to show a difference in outcome between male and female trauma patients. Age, mechanism and severity of injury-but not gender-were identified as factors influencing survival.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • California / epidemiology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Injury Severity Score
  • Length of Stay
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Regression Analysis
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sex Factors
  • Wounds and Injuries / epidemiology
  • Wounds and Injuries / mortality*