Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002 Nov-Dec;27(6):612-7.

    Postherniorrhaphy urinary retention--effect of local, regional, and general anesthesia: a review.

    Source

    Department of Surgical Gastroenterology 435, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:

    Postherniorrhaphy urinary retention (UR) may depend on the anesthetic technique. We therefore reviewed available published studies of UR in relation to anesthetic technique.

    METHODS:

    A Medline-based search (1966-November 2001) revealed 70 nonrandomized and 2 randomized studies.

    RESULTS:

    The incidence of UR was lower with local anesthesia (LA) (33 in 8991 patients, 0.37%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24%-0.49%) compared with regional anesthesia (RA) (150 in 6191 patients, 2.42%, 95% CI 2.04%-2.81%) and general anesthesia (GA) (344 in 11471 patients, 3.00%, 95% CI 2.69%-3.31%).

    CONCLUSION:

    The low incidence of UR with LA is in accordance with the inhibitory effects of RA and GA on bladder function. Data from newer short-acting techniques of GA and RA are required to define the optimal anesthetic for inguinal herniorrhaphy.

    PMID:
    12430114
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk