Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
FEBS Lett. 2002 Oct 2;529(1):126-30.

Quality assessment of multiple alignment programs.

Author information

  • 1Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17177, Stockholm, Sweden.

Abstract

A renewed interest in the multiple sequence alignment problem has given rise to several new algorithms. In contrast to traditional progressive methods, computationally expensive score optimization strategies are now predominantly employed. We systematically tested four methods (Poa, Dialign, T-Coffee and ClustalW) for the speed and quality of their alignments. As test sequences we used structurally derived alignments from BAliBASE and synthetic alignments generated by Rose. The tests included alignments of variable numbers of domains embedded in random spacer sequences. Overall, Dialign was the most accurate in cases with low sequence identity, while T-Coffee won in cases with high sequence identity. The fast Poa algorithm was almost as accurate, while ClustalW could compete only in strictly global cases with high sequence similarity.

PMID:
12354624
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk